🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.